Comments on: Vampires

By: tammy

tammy — Fri, 13 Nov 2009 01:55:52 +0000

I would accord this cine -100 stars.

I can’t accept that bodies accept accustomed this cine such a aerial rating. This is possibly the affliction cine anytime fabricated in the accomplished history of man. James Wood as a covering clad gun accretion vampire hunter is amusing at best. Daniel Baldwin needs to lose some weight. And the vampires actively charge a bath. Blaaaaah! That’s all I can say…and that I actively capital to allotment my wrists back I watched it on its aperture day, Halloween 2000 . Oh god, why did I watch the accomplished thing? I assumption I like punishment, I guess. Don’t watch unless you appetite every bookish anticipation ripped out of your head.

By: greg

greg — Thu, 12 Nov 2009 23:23:27 +0000

This cine is one of the affliction vampire movies I’ve anytime seen. It’s abhorrent and worse than cheesy. It’s addition blur that portrays the angry vampire and the adept that needs to be dead because he’s so old and able that banausic banausic freakin blah. The way they annoyance the vampires out into the sun and how they access into bonfire is absolutely impaired with abhorrent effects.

By: gia

gia — Thu, 12 Nov 2009 22:20:12 +0000

What a terrible, terrible, awful, abhorrent movie.

I saw this years ago in theater, hated it, and again saw it at the video abundance and anticipation "Maybe I was wrong." So I busy it. And boy, was I right! This cine is a allotment of garbage!

I accept never hated a casting of characters added than Jack Crow and his bulk of morons. How can you basis for a guy who tortures and beats up priests? Who consistently swears and abuses women? This is the HERO of the film? Riiiight. And his amaranthine references to "mahogany"... is this declared to be funny? Because it's absolutely not, it's annoying and brainless and makes the appearance alike added unlikable, if possible. Perhaps this was the point: an "over the top", "balls out" hero and movie. Yeah, if that's what was attempted here, it doesn't appear beyond at all. There is no irony or tongue-in-cheek with this character. Just a brainless little man who consistently appears to be aggravating to atone for something. "I'm such a bad dude! Look! Look!" The guy is a abhorrent toad.

There are abounding added movies with acknowledgment visuals, added gore, a creepier feel, and bigger artifice in this genre. This cine is so bad it isn't alike laughable. It's embarassing.

This cine didn't accord me a little "wood". A little "mahogany". It is a decay of blur and able cine admirers will abstain it like the plague.

By: josh

josh — Thu, 12 Nov 2009 15:40:20 +0000

Don’t decay your time or your money. Get “Fright Night” instead.

By: marietta

marietta — Thu, 12 Nov 2009 13:29:36 +0000

One of the affliction movies I’ve anytime seen. The absence of plot, poor acting, bad directing, bad dialogue, bad EVERYTHING accomplish this one unbearable. Sure, the cine gave me nightmares, but not ones of vampires and ghouls, no, rather ones in which I was to accusation for this crapfest, biconcave abysmal into a circling of abasement and axis to alcoholism…I can alone Imagine what John Carpenter charge feel like afterwards every keeps cogent him how this cine sucked.

You appetite vampires?

Watch From Dusk ’til aurora , Shadow of the Vampire, Bram Stokers Dracula, Blade.

…. but by all means, DO NOT WATCH THIS MOVIE!!!!!!!!!!